Criteria The Legion of Merit is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States without degree for exceptionally outstanding conduct in the performance of meritorious service to the United States. ... The Legion of Merit is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States without degree for exceptionally outstanding conduct in the performance of meritorious service to the United States. The performance must merit recognition by individuals in a key position which was performed in a clearly exceptional manner. MoreHide
Comments Colonel Samuel L. Russell has distinguished himself through exceptionally meritorious service while serving in positions of increasing responsibility in a career spanning over 29 years. During his fin... Colonel Samuel L. Russell has distinguished himself through exceptionally meritorious service while serving in positions of increasing responsibility in a career spanning over 29 years. During his final decade of service, he served as: Commander, 94th Brigade Support Battalion, 1 Q1h Mountain Division (Light Infantry), Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General, Training and Doctrine Command, Chief, Mobility Division, Directorate of Logistics, G4, US Army Central, and, finally, Chief of Proponency Division, Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania.
Colonel Russell commanded the 94th Brigade Support Battalion, 1 Q1h Mountain Division (Light Infantry), at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and deployed across Iraq, from December 2007 to March 2009. He expertly led, managed and trained a battalion with eight company-sized units comprised of 870 personnel, in direct support of 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 101h Mountain Division (Light Infantry). He masterfully orchestrated the preparation, deployment and redeployment of his unit. His combat-focused training plan polished competence at team and platoon level, while instilling confidence in leaders at all levels, which infused cohesion across the battalion.
Colonel Russell's leadership, guidance, and intellect resulted in successful execution of all missions executed in Iraq. His team successfully planned, synchronized and executed over 310 ground combat logistics missions and over 250 aerial resupplies throughout hostile territory, which enabled operations with ammunition, fuel, repair parts, water, and food. Under his leadership, the battalion treated almost 5,400 patients, completed over 8,600 maintenance jobs, and maintained an unprecedented operational readiness rate of 97% across the brigade combat team. He further realigned the brigade support area to improve tactical operations, while eliminating years of unit excess, and setting conditions for transferring bases to the Iraq Security Forces.
Colonel Russell served as the Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General, at Fort Lee, Virginia, from April 2009 to June 2011. In that role, he mastered personnel development oversight as the Quartermaster branch proponent. His team facilitated, managed, and led efforts on a number of significant personnel actions necessary to functionally change officer, warrant officer and enlisted Quartermaster force structure to meet changing Army operational missions. He further leveraged his human resources manager experience developing seasoned recommendations to strengthen Officer Corps management initiatives. Under his leadership, the staff planned and executed two highly successful annual Quartermaster War-fighter Symposiums which brought over 230 leaders across the regiment together to synchronize logistics support to the Army. His innovative implementation of web broadcasting and social media expanded the participating audience, improved dialogue, and avoided travel expenses.
Colonel Russell was the Chief, Mobility Division, Directorate of Logistics, G4, US Army Central, at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, from July 2012 to June 2015. He was masterful in coordinating the incredibly complex surface movements and multi-modal movements associated with simultaneous operations to retrograde material from Afghanistan, while significantly reducing the amount of ammunition in the Middle East, and while relocating joint force units to set the U.S. Central Command Theater of Operations. His team maintained leader focus on retrograde operations in Afghanistan through regular 3-Star briefings, which maximized efficiency of the process. He seized on the Commanding General's campaign plan and analyzed the lines of effort which refined critical measures of effectiveness and greatly enhanced inter and intra-theater lines of communication across the operational area and ensured the command met all Title X responsibilities. He later served as the Deputy G4 (Forward) during the critical build up returning forces to Iraq, under Operation Inherent Resolve. His staff coordinated the theater sustainment plan, as well as directed Humanitarian Relief missions that airdropped supplies to Yazidi refugees on Sinjar Mountain.
Colonel Russell arrived at the United States Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, in June 2015. His strategic thinking was immediately evident as the Chief of Strategy, Policy, and Concepts within the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute. He leveraged relationships to advance emerging ideas on stabilization while building consensus amongst key stakeholders, including leaders within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Army Staff, and Training and Doctrine Command. His leadership as Chief, Proponency Division resulted in continuous doctrine improvements, including JP 3-07 which added the concept of combining defeat mechanisms with stability mechanisms (compel, control, influence, and support) to conduct operations. It also expanded the discussion on stability across the conflict continuum, to clarify the place of stability actions in all types of joint operations and the phasing construct. His team successfully closed six tasks directed by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council. His leadership and expertise influenced numerous documents, including white papers that informed transition teams at Departments of Defense and State, as well as the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Colonel Russell's exceptional service was in keeping with the highest traditions of military service and reflects great credit upon him, the United States Army War College, and the United States Army. MoreHide
Best Friends
COL Johnny Johnston COL Rob Horneck COL Sid Thomas COL T.J. Edwards COL Mike Davey LTC Walt Llamas LTC Jesse Wightman LTC Steve Thomas LTC Jasaon Tomasetti LTC Cliff Crawford LTC Bud Bittner LTC Rick Clifton LTC Mimi Dill LTC Gordon Joczik LTC Mike Hampton LTC Mike Williams LTC Marcus Reinhart
Chain of Command
BG Karen LeDoux, G4 BG Beth Austin, G4 BG Charles Taylor, CoS MG Kurt Stein, DCG-S MG Gary Cheek, DCG-O LTG Vince Brooks, CG
Criteria The Legion of Merit is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States without degree for exceptionally outstanding conduct in the performance of meritorious service to the United States. ... The Legion of Merit is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States without degree for exceptionally outstanding conduct in the performance of meritorious service to the United States. The performance must merit recognition by individuals in a key position which was performed in a clearly exceptional manner. MoreHide
Comments The Legion of Merit is awarded to Colonel Samuel L. Russell, United States Army Central for exceptionally meritorious service while serving as the G4 Mobility Division Chief. Colonel Russell's outsta... The Legion of Merit is awarded to Colonel Samuel L. Russell, United States Army Central for exceptionally meritorious service while serving as the G4 Mobility Division Chief. Colonel Russell's outstanding performance and dedication to duty contributed significantly to the overwhelming success of the unit's mission in support of Operations Enduring Freedom, Spartan Shield, and Inherent Resolve. Colonel Russell's actions are in keeping with the finest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, United States Army Central and the United States Army. 6 July 2012 to 6 July 2015 by order of the Secretary of the Army this 18th day of June 2013. Signed: James L. Terry, Lieutenant General, U.S. Army, Commanding General. MoreHide
Criteria Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have been deployed abroad for service in the Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001, and to a future date to be determine... Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have been deployed abroad for service in the Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001, and to a future date to be determined MoreHide
As of 15 October 2014, the U.S. military operation name Operation Inherent Resolve officially refers to the US's military actions against ISIL, specifically the campaign in Iraq and the campaign in Sy
As of 15 October 2014, the U.S. military operation name Operation Inherent Resolve officially refers to the US's military actions against ISIL, specifically the campaign in Iraq and the campaign in Syria.
Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) is the U.S. military's operational name for the military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, in the vernacular, Daesh), including both the campaign in Iraq and the campaign in Syria.
Unlike their coalition partners, and unlike previous combat operations, no name was initially given to the conflict against ISIS by the U.S. government. The decision to keep the conflict nameless drew considerable media criticism.
The U.S. decided in October 2014 to name its military efforts against ISIS as "Operation Inherent Resolve"; the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) news release announcing the name noted that:
According to CENTCOM officials, the name INHERENT RESOLVE is intended to reflect the unwavering resolve and deep commitment of the U.S. and partner nations in the region and around the globe to eliminate the terrorist group ISIL and the threat they pose to Iraq, the region and the wider international community. It also symbolizes the willingness and dedication of coalition members to work closely with our friends in the region and apply all available dimensions of national power necessary—diplomatic, informational, military, economic—to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL.
The Defense Department announced at the end of October 2014 that troops operating in support of Operation Inherent Resolve after 15 June were eligible for the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal. Service areas are: Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as troops supporting the operation in the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea east of 25 degrees longitude. The medal is approved retroactively beginning 15 June, the Pentagon said.
Description "Operation Enduring Freedom" (OEF) is the current official name used by the U.S. government for the War in Afghanistan, together with a number of smaller military actions, under the umbrella of the Gl"Operation Enduring Freedom" (OEF) is the current official name used by the U.S. government for the War in Afghanistan, together with a number of smaller military actions, under the umbrella of the Global "War on Terror" (GWOT).
The operation was originally called "Operation Infinite Justice", but as similar phrases have been used by adherents of several religions as an exclusive description of God, it is believed to have been changed to avoid offense to Muslims, who are the majority religion in Afghanistan. U.S. President George W. Bush's remark that "this crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take a while", which prompted widespread criticism from the Islamic world, may also have contributed to the renaming of the operation.
The Operation comprises several subordinate operations:
Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan (OEF-)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Philippines (OEF-P, formerly Operation Freedom Eagle)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Horn of Africa (OEF-HOA)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Pankisi Gorge (completed in 2004)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Trans Sahara (OEF-TS; see also Insurgency in the Maghreb)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Caribbean and Central America (OEF-CCA)
The term "OEF" typically refers to the war in Afghanistan. Other operations, such as the Georgia Train and Equip Program, are only loosely or nominally connected to OEF, such as through government funding vehicles. All the operations, however, have a focus on counterterrorism activities.
Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan, which is a joint U.S., U.K. and Afghan operation, is separate from the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which is an operation of North Atlantic Treaty Organization nations including the U.S. and U.K. The two operations run in parallel, and although it has been intended that they merge for some time, this has not yet happened.
Overview
In response to the attacks of 11 September, the early combat operations that took place on 7 October 2001 to include a mix of strikes from land-based B-1 Lancer, B-2 Spirit and B-52 Stratofortress bombers, carrier-based F-14 Tomcat and F/A-18 Hornet fighters, and Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from both U.S. and British ships and submarines signaled the start of Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan (OEF-A).
The initial military objectives of OEF-A, as articulated by President George W. Bush in his 20 September Address to a Joint Session of Congress and his 7 October address to the country, included the destruction of terrorist training camps and infrastructure within Afghanistan, the capture of al-Qaeda leaders, and the cessation of terrorist activities in Afghanistan."
In January 2002, over 1,200 soldiers from the United States Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC) deployed to the Philippines to support the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in their push to uproot terrorist forces on the island of Basilan. Of those groups included are Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah.[8] The operation consisted of training the AFP in counter-terrorist operations as well as supporting the local people with humanitarian aid in Operation Smiles.
In October 2002, the Combined Task Force 150 and United States military Special Forces established themselves in Djibouti at Camp Lemonnier. The stated goals of the operation were to provide humanitarian aid and patrol the Horn of Africa to reduce the abilities of terrorist organizations in the region. Similar to OEF-P, the goal of humanitarian aid was emphasised, ostensibly to prevent militant organizations from being able to take hold amongst the population as well as reemerge after being removed.
The military aspect involves coalition forces searching and boarding ships entering the region for illegal cargo as well as providing training and equipment to the armed forces in the region. The humanitarian aspect involves building schools, clinics and water wells to enforce the confidence of the local people.
Since 2001, the cumulative expenditure by the U.S. government on Operation Enduring Freedom has exceeded $150 billion.
The operation continues, with military direction mostly coming from United States Central Command.... More
Best Friends
COL "Big Al" Davis COL Rick Harney COL Marshall Ramsey LTC Steve Davis Dr. Steve Anders Mr. Jim Tolbert Mrs. Peggy Joyner LTC Loren Schriner LTC Tripp Blanton
Chain of Command
BG Jesse R. Cross and MG Chambers BG Gwen Bingham and MG James Hodge
Other Memories
Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments For exceptional meritorious service as Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General where he provided expert analysis, coordination, planning, and staffing of policy, program, and procedural actions for... For exceptional meritorious service as Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General where he provided expert analysis, coordination, planning, and staffing of policy, program, and procedural actions for the eight personnel development life cycle management functions for Officer, Warrant Officer and Enlisted Quartermaster Soldiers. Colonel Russell's superior leadershi, applicable functional knowledge, and professional initiative were critical to the mission success for numerous Quartermaster personnel development actions. His devotion to duty, superior leadership and outstanding professionalism reflect great credit upon him, the 23rd Quartermaster Brigade, the United States Army Quartermaster School and the United States Army.
17 Apr 2009 - 29 Jun 2011
This 29th Day of June 2011
Gwen Bingham
Brigadier General, US Army
Commandant, US Army Quartermster
School/The Quartermaster General MoreHide
Criteria The Army Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement,... The Army Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement, or meritorious service. MoreHide
Comments For exceptional meritorious achievement as Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General, in support of the 2011 Quartermaster Symposium. Colonel Russell's outstanding leadership, planning and coordinat... For exceptional meritorious achievement as Chief, Office of the Quartermaster General, in support of the 2011 Quartermaster Symposium. Colonel Russell's outstanding leadership, planning and coordination skills proved highly instrumental in the successful execution of Symposium events, and resulted in countless laudatory remarks by all in attendance. His dedication to duty, leadership, and high standards are in keeping with the highest traditions of military service and reflect great credit upon him, the United States Army Quartermaster School, and the United States Army.
1 April 2011 to 18 June 2011
This 28th Day of June 2011
Johnny W. Sokolosky
COL, LG
Commanding MoreHide
Best Friends
PEERS LTC later COL Craig A. Collier, Commander, 3rd Squadron, 89th Cavalry Regiment LTC Gregory Baine, Commander, 2nd Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment LTC Shannon L. Boehm, Commander, Brigade Special Troops Battalion LTC Ralph L. Kauzlarich, Commander, 2nd Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment LTC Scott McKean, Commander, 1st Battalion, 66th Armor Regiment LTC Troy Perry, Commander, 2nd Battalion, 69th Armor Regiment LTC Timothy F. Watson, Commander, 2nd Battalion, 4th Infantry Regiment LTC Dennis Yates, Commander, 5th Battalion, 25th Field Artillery Regiment CSM Christopher K. Greca, Command Sergeant Major, 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team
SUBORDINATES MAJ Adrian Gamez, Battalion Executive Officer MAJ Eric J. Sloughfy, Support Operations Officer CPT Jay S. Schroder, later MAJ Jason A. Tucker, S3 Operations Officer CPT Matthew H. Alexander, later CPT Jeffrey D. Ust, later CPT Grady H. Adkins, Commander, D Forward Support Company CPT Robert T. Eliason, later CPT Kevin R. Schuster, Commander, C Medical Company CPT Melissa N. Gontz, later CPT James Potter, Commander, Headquarters and Headquarters Company CPT Natalie V-R. Hayes, later CPT Abraham Sweeney, Commander, G Forward Support Company CPT Andrew C. Reed, later CPT Mark A. Folkerts, Commander, B Maintenance Company CPT Thurman C. Reynolds, later CPT Marcus Q. Hathorn, Commander, F Forward Support Company CPT Jay S. Schroder, later CPT Brian J. Welch, Commander, E Forward Support Company CPT Adrian J. Vielhauer, later CPT Melissa N. Gontz, Commander, A Distribution Company CSM Ofelia Webb, later SGM Duane Harb, later CSM Gloria D. Farrow, Command Sergeant Major, 94th Brigade Support Battalion
Chain of Command
SUPERIORS MG Michael L. Oates, Commanding General, 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), later MG Jeffery W. Hammond, Commanding General, Multi-National Division-Baghdad COL Mark A. Dewhurst, Commander, 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team
Criteria The Bronze Star Medal may be awarded to individuals who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States in a combat theater, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding ac... The Bronze Star Medal may be awarded to individuals who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States in a combat theater, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement, or by meritorious service not involving aerial flight. MoreHide
Comments The Bronze Star Medal is awarded to Lieutenant Colonel Samuel L. Russell, HHC, 94th BSB, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division for exceptionally meritorious service while assigned as the bat... The Bronze Star Medal is awarded to Lieutenant Colonel Samuel L. Russell, HHC, 94th BSB, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division for exceptionally meritorious service while assigned as the battalion commander during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Lieutenant Colonel Russell's outstanding performance, expertise, and contributions were instrumental to the unit's overall success during combat operations. His actions reflect distinct credit on him, the Multi-National Division--Baghdad, and the United States Army. 26 November 2007 to 5 February 2009.
Signed: Jeffrey D. Hammond, Major General, US Army, Commanding, 11 December 2008 MoreHide
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Lieutenant Colonel Samuel L. Russell, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 94th Brigade Support Battalion for exceptionally meritorious service as the bat... The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Lieutenant Colonel Samuel L. Russell, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 94th Brigade Support Battalion for exceptionally meritorious service as the battalion commander. His dedication to duty, selfless service, loyalty, and respect for Soldiers contributed greatly to mission accomplishment. Lieutenant Colonel Russell's outstanding performance is in keeping with the finest traditions of military service and reflects great credit upon himself, the 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), and the United States Army. From 18 January 2007 to 1 April 2009 on this 23d day of January, 2009. Signed Michael L. Oates, Major General, US Army, Commanding MoreHide
Criteria The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous... The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles. To be eligible for the Iraq Campaign Medal, a Service member must be assigned or attahced to a unit participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq for 30 consecutive days or for 60 nonconsecutive days or meet one of the following criteria: Be engaged in actual combat against the enemy under circumstances involving grave danger of death or serious bodily injury from enemy action, regardless of the amount of time the individual has served in Iraq; While participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom or on official duties (regardless of the time spent in Iraq) is killed, wounded or injured to the extent that he or she requires medical evacuation from Iraq; or, While participating as a regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, within, or over Iraq in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these criteria shall count as one day towards the 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive day requirement. Service members who qualified for the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal by reason of service between March 19, 2003 and April 30, 2005 shall remain qualified for that medal. However, any such person may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal for that service, at his or her request. In addition, any Army soldier who was authorized the arrowhead device may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with arrowhead device in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal with arrowhead device. No service member shall be entitled to both the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and the Iraq Campaign Medal for the same act, achievement, or period of service. Only one award of the Iraq Campaign Medal may be authorized for any individual. The Iraq Campaign Medal may be awarded posthumously to any Service members who loses his or her life while, as a direct result of participating in qualifying operations, without regard to the length of time in the area of eligibility, if otherwise applicable. MoreHide
Comments
Iraqi Sovereignty - January 1, 2009 to a date To Be Determined
Criteria The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (p... The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (provided they have an active Army status on or after August 1, 1981). This ribbon may not be awarded for overseas service recognized by another United States service medal. MoreHide
Description During 2008 and 2009, all non-U.S. foreign forces withdrew from Iraq. Withdrawal of all non-U.S. forces was complete by 31 July 2009. As of 1 January 2009, the Iraqi government became fully responsiblDuring 2008 and 2009, all non-U.S. foreign forces withdrew from Iraq. Withdrawal of all non-U.S. forces was complete by 31 July 2009. As of 1 January 2009, the Iraqi government became fully responsible, through its security ministries, for maintaining and providing security and rule of law for its populace. Furthermore, as of 28 June 2009, no foreign forces were stationed within any of Iraq's major cities. The United States decided after negotiations to cease combat operations, that is, patrolling, serving arrest warrants, route clearance, etc., within Iraq by 1 September 2010, and transition to a pure advise, train and assist role. The changing mission entailed major troop reductions; from 115,000 on 15 December 2009, to 50,000 by 1 September 2010, and to zero by 31 December 2011.
As a result of the evolution of Operation Iraqi Freedom, three major commands (Multi-National Force – Iraq, Multi-National Corps – Iraq and Multi-National Security Transition Command – Iraq) were merged on 1 January 2010. The streamlining reduced the total number of staff positions by 41%, and serves the new advise, train and assist role of the American forces under the U.S.–Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement. The reduced number of staff positions decreased the personnel requirements on the United States armed forces. This also meant that further space was created for the reconstitution of the U.S. military after the end of significant combat operations. (This reconstitution may include, for example, longer leave for many personnel, enhanced space for psychological counselling, equipment repair and maintenance, transport of enormous amounts of equipment, supplies, and materiel south to Kuwait and onward, reconsideration of requirements, etc.).
The new USF–I was claimed to be organized into three divisions, which as of January 2010 were actually four. United States Division – North takes over from the former MND–N, United States Division – Center takes over from United States Force – West and MND–Baghdad, amalgamated on 23 January 2010, and United States Division – South, takes over from the old MND–South. In December 2009/January 2010 when the transition occurred, the 34th Infantry Division was providing the headquarters of MND/USD South. On 3 February 2010, the 1st Infantry Division took command of USD–South (covering nine Governorates of Iraq, including Wasit Governorate and Babil Governorate) from the 34th Infantry Division. A number of Advise and Assist (A&A) Brigades were created to carry out the Advise and Assist mission. Advise and Assist brigades were 'standard combat brigades with a complement of forty-eight extra majors and colonels to serve as advisers to Iraqi troops.'
MNSTC–I became U.S. Forces – Iraq, Advising and Training, which was under a major general, double-hatted as Commander, NATO Training Mission – Iraq (NTM–I).
Withdrawals
1 January 2009 – The U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement went into effect, and gave the Government of Iraq de jure responsibility of maintaining and providing security for all of its people. Approximately 150,000 foreign troops in Iraq.
28 June 2009 – Foreign forces were no longer stationed within any of Iraq's major cities. Proclaimed as a national holiday by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
31 July 2009 – The last large groups of non-U.S. foreign forces completed their withdrawal from Iraq.
1 January 2010 – The major commands Multi-National Force – Iraq, Multi-National Corps – Iraq and Multi-National Security Transition Command – Iraq merged into the unified command United States Forces – Iraq, reducing the total number of staff positions by 41%. Approximately 112,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.
7 March 2010 – Iraq held parliamentary elections, its second under its democratic constitution, and is seen as an important milestone for the young Iraqi political system; this leaves approximately 96,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.
1 September 2010 – American forces ceased all combat operations, i.e. patrolling, serving arrest warrants, route clearance, etc., and transitioned to a pure advise, train and assist role. Operation Iraqi Freedom is officially concluded... More
Criteria The Meritorious Unit Commendation is awarded to units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in performance of outstanding services for at least six continuous months during a period of military operat... The Meritorious Unit Commendation is awarded to units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in performance of outstanding services for at least six continuous months during a period of military operations against an armed enemy on or after January 1, 1944. MoreHide
Description For exceptionally meritorious service. During the period 30 November 2007 to 5 January 2009, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 94th Support Battalion and its subordinate units displayed exceptio... For exceptionally meritorious service. During the period 30 November 2007 to 5 January 2009, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 94th Support Battalion and its subordinate units displayed exceptionally meritorious service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The unit demonstrated the ability to innovate and accomplish the mission far beyond the call of duty. Further, the battalion's ability to provide the 4th Brigade Combat Team with combat service support and combat health support demonstrates an outstanding effort. Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 94th Support Battalion's outstanding performance of duty is in keeping with the finest traditions of military service and reflects distinct credit upon the unit, the 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), and the United States Army. MoreHide
Criteria The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous... The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles. To be eligible for the Iraq Campaign Medal, a Service member must be assigned or attahced to a unit participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq for 30 consecutive days or for 60 nonconsecutive days or meet one of the following criteria: Be engaged in actual combat against the enemy under circumstances involving grave danger of death or serious bodily injury from enemy action, regardless of the amount of time the individual has served in Iraq; While participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom or on official duties (regardless of the time spent in Iraq) is killed, wounded or injured to the extent that he or she requires medical evacuation from Iraq; or, While participating as a regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, within, or over Iraq in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these criteria shall count as one day towards the 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive day requirement. Service members who qualified for the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal by reason of service between March 19, 2003 and April 30, 2005 shall remain qualified for that medal. However, any such person may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal for that service, at his or her request. In addition, any Army soldier who was authorized the arrowhead device may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with arrowhead device in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal with arrowhead device. No service member shall be entitled to both the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and the Iraq Campaign Medal for the same act, achievement, or period of service. Only one award of the Iraq Campaign Medal may be authorized for any individual. The Iraq Campaign Medal may be awarded posthumously to any Service members who loses his or her life while, as a direct result of participating in qualifying operations, without regard to the length of time in the area of eligibility, if otherwise applicable. MoreHide
Comments
The Surge - January 10, 2007 to December 31, 2008
Description In the context of the Iraq War, the surge refers to United States President George W. Bush's 2007 increase in the number of American troops in order to provide security to Baghdad and Al Anbar ProvincIn the context of the Iraq War, the surge refers to United States President George W. Bush's 2007 increase in the number of American troops in order to provide security to Baghdad and Al Anbar Province.
The surge had been developed under the working title "The New Way Forward" and it was announced in January 2007 by Bush during a television speech. Bush ordered the deployment of more than 20,000 soldiers into Iraq, five additional brigades, and sent the majority of them into Baghdad. He also extended the tour of most of the Army troops in country and some of the Marines already in the Anbar Province area. The President described the overall objective as establishing a "...unified, democratic federal Iraq that can govern itself, defend itself, and sustain itself, and is an ally in the War on Terror." The major element of the strategy was a change in focus for the US military "to help Iraqis clear and secure neighborhoods, to help them protect the local population, and to help ensure that the Iraqi forces left behind are capable of providing the security". The President stated that the surge would then provide the time and conditions conducive to reconciliation among political and ethnic factions.
Units deployed
The five U.S. Army brigades committed to Iraq as part of the surge were
2nd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division (Infantry): 3,447 troops. Deployed to Baghdad, January 2007
4th Brigade, 1st Infantry Division (Infantry): 3,447 troops. Deployed to Baghdad, February 2007
3rd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division (Heavy): 3,784 troops. Deployed to southern Baghdad Belts, March 2007
4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division (Stryker): 3,921 troops. Deployed to Diyala province, April 2007
2nd Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division (Heavy): 3,784 troops. Deployed to the southeast of Baghdad, May 2007
This brought the number of U.S. brigades in Iraq from 15 to 20. Additionally, 4,000 Marines in Al Anbar had their 7-month tour extended. These included Marines from the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, the 2nd Battalion 4th Marines, the 1st Battalion 6th Marines and the 3rd Battalion, 4th Marines. Most of the 150,000 Army personnel had their 12-month tours extended as well. By July, 2007, the percentage of the mobilized Army deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan was almost 30%; the percentage of the mobilized Marine Corps deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan was 13.5%.[55]
Operations
The plan began with a major operation to secure Baghdad, codenamed Operation Fardh al-Qanoon (Operation Imposing Law), which was launched in February 2007. However, only in mid-June 2007, with the full deployment of the 28,000 additional U.S. troops, could major counter-insurgency efforts get fully under way. Operation Phantom Thunder was launched throughout Iraq on June 16, with a number of subordinate operations targeting insurgents in Diyala province, Anbar province and the southern Baghdad Belts. The additional surge troops also participated in Operation Phantom Strike and Operation Phantom Phoenix, named after the III "Phantom" Corps which was the major U.S. unit in Iraq throughout 2007.
Counterinsurgency strategy
Counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq changed significantly under the command of General Petraeus since the 2007 troop surge began. The newer approach attempted to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people through building relationships, preventing civilian casualties and compromising with and even hiring some former enemies. The new strategy was population-centric in that it focused in protecting the population rather than killing insurgents. In implementing this strategy, Petraeus used experienced gained while commanding the 101st Airborne Division in Mosul in 2003. He also explained these ideas extensively in Field Manual 3-24: Counterinsurgency, which he assisted in the writing of while serving as the Commanding General of Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and the U.S. Army Combined Arms Center (CAC) located there.
Instead of seeing every Iraqi as a potential enemy, the current COIN strategy focuses on building relationships and getting cooperation from the Iraqis against Al Qaeda and minimizing the number of enemies for U.S. forces. The belief is that maintaining a long term presence of troops in a community improves security and allows for relationships and trust to develop between the locals and the U.S. military. Civilian casualties are minimized by carefully measured use of force. This means less bombing and overwhelming firepower, and more soldiers using restraint and even sometimes taking more risk in the process.
Another method of gaining cooperation is by paying locals, including former insurgents, to work as local security forces. Former Sunni insurgents have been hired by the U.S. military to stop cooperating with Al Qaeda and to start fighting against them.
To implement this strategy, troops were concentrated in the Baghdad area (at the time, Baghdad accounted for 50% of all the violence in Iraq).[64] Whereas in the past, Coalition forces isolated themselves from Iraqis by living in large forward operating bases far from population centers,[65] troops during the surge lived among the Iraqis, operating from joint security stations (JSSs) located within Baghdad itself and shared with Iraqi security forces. Coalition units were permanently assigned to a given area so that they could build long-term relationships with the local Iraqi population and security forces.
However, opponents to occupation such as US Army Col. David H. Hackworth (Ret.), asked whether he thought that British soldiers are better at nation-building than the Americans, said "They were very good at lining up local folks to do the job like operating the sewers and turning on the electricity. Far better than us -- we are heavy-handed, and in Iraq we don't understand the people and the culture. Thus we did not immediately employ locals in police and military activities to get them to build and stabilize their nation."
CNN war correspondent Michael Ware, who has reported from Iraq since before the U.S. invasion in 2003 had a similar dim view of occupation saying, "there will be very much mixed reaction in Iraq” to a long-term troop presence, but he added, “what’s the point and will it be worth it?” Mr. Ware contended that occupation could, "ferment further resentment [towards the U.S]."
Results
Security situation
Hostile and Non-Hostile Deaths.
Despite a massive security crackdown in Baghdad associated with the surge in coalition troop strength, the monthly death toll in Iraq rose 15% in March 2007. 1,869 Iraqi civilians were killed and 2,719 were wounded in March, compared to 1,646 killed and 2,701 wounded in February. In March, 165 Iraqi policemen were killed against 131 the previous month, while 44 Iraqi soldiers died compared to 29 in February. US military deaths in March were nearly double those of the Iraqi army, despite Iraqi forces leading the security crackdown in Baghdad. The death toll among insurgent militants fell to 481 in March, compared to 586 killed in February; however, the number of arrests jumped to 5,664 in March against 1,921 in February.
Three months after the start of the surge, troops controlled less than a third of the capital, far short of the initial goal, according to an internal military assessment completed in May 2007. Violence was especially chronic in mixed Shiite-Sunni neighborhoods in western Baghdad. Improvements had not yet been widespread or lasting across Baghdad.
Significant attack trends.
On September 10, 2007, David Petraeus delivered his part of the Report to Congress on the Situation in Iraq. He concluded that "the military objectives of the surge are, in large measure, being met." He cited what he called recent consistent declines in security incidents, which he attributed to recent blows dealt against Al-Qaeda in Iraq during the surge. He added that "we have also disrupted Shia militia extremists, capturing the head and numerous other leaders of the Iranian-supported Special Groups, along with a senior Lebanese Hezbollah operative supporting Iran's activities in Iraq." He argued that Coalition and Iraqi operations had drastically reduced ethno-sectarian violence in the country, though he stated that the gains were not entirely even. He recommended a gradual drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq with a goal of reaching pre-surge troop levels by July 2008 and stated that further withdraws would be "premature."
Sectarian violence.
While Petraeus credited the surge for the decrease in violence, the decrease also closely corresponded with a cease-fire order given by Iraqi political leader Muqtada al-Sadr on August 29, 2007. Al-Sadr's order, to stand down for six months, was distributed to his loyalists following the deaths of more than 50 Shia Muslim pilgrims during fighting in Karbala the day earlier.
Michael E. O'Hanlon and Jason H. Campbell of the Brookings Institution stated on December 22, 2007 that Iraq’s security environment had reached its best levels since early 2004 and credited Petraeus' strategy for the improvement. CNN stated that month that the monthly death rate for US troops in Iraq had hit its second lowest point during the entire course of the war. Military representatives attributed the successful reduction of violence and casualties directly to the troop surge. At the same time, the Iraqi Ministry of Interior reported similar reductions for civilian deaths.
Iraqi Security Force deaths.
However, on September 6, 2007, a report by an independent military commission headed by General James Jones found that the decrease in violence may have been due to areas being overrun by either Shias or Sunnis. In addition, in August 2007, the International Organization for Migration and the Iraqi Red Crescent Organization indicated that more Iraqis had fled since the troop increase.
On February 16, 2008, Iraqi Defense Minister Abdel Qader Jassim Mohammed told reporters that the surge was "working very well" and that Iraq has a "pressing" need for troops to stay to secure Iraqi borders.[76] He stated that "Results for 2007 prove that– Baghdad is good now".
In June 2008, the U.S. Department of Defense reported that "the security, political and economic trends in Iraq continue to be positive; however, they remain fragile, reversible and uneven."
U.S. troop fatalities in Iraq by month, the orange and blue months being post-troop surge.
In the month of July, 2008, US forces lost only 13 soldiers, the lowest number of casualties sustained by US troops in one month since the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Also, a report by the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, given to Congress in May 2008, and published July 1, stated that the Iraqi government had met 15 of the 18 political benchmarks set out for them.... More
Memories Commander 94th Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (Light), aCommander 94th Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (Light), attached to Multi-National Division-Baghdad.... More
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Lieutenant Colonel Samuel Russell, United States Army, Headquarters and Headquarters Support Company, Special Troops Battalion for exceptionally meritorious... The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Lieutenant Colonel Samuel Russell, United States Army, Headquarters and Headquarters Support Company, Special Troops Battalion for exceptionally meritorious service as the battalion Executive Officer and Brigade Operations Officer. Lieutenant Colonel Russell's superb leadership, technical and tactical expertise, and commitment to excellence contributed greatly to the overall success of this command. His selfless service and dedication to duty are in keeping with the highest traditions of military service and reflect great credit upon himself, the 3d Infantry Division, and the United States Army. From 1 June 2002 to 12 January 2007 this 16th day of January 2007.
Signed: Rick Lynch, Major General, US Army, Commanding. MoreHide
Best Friends
LTC Shawn Morrissey, DCO MAJ Kim Daub, Dep SPO MAJ Jim Kazmierczak, Bde S3 MAJ Leona Knight, Plans SGM Gloria Farrow, S3 SGM Maj. Ian Skipper, HMRLC
Best Moment
Visiting an Iraqi grass hut village to deliver soccer uniforms.
Worst Moment
I served as the Division Logistics Effects OIC. While in Iraq from Jun - Dec 2005 I was dubbed the Baghdad Logistics Effects Coordinator or BLEC (Bleck!). This not an authorized position, but I was about to be promoted to LTC and COL Layer didn't want to lose me to a higher level staff. Effects based operations was the new buzz word in the Joint community, so he capitalized on this and created the position. The position didn't catch on, and I believe I'm the only officer to ever hold that title.
Chain of Command
COL Brian Layer - Bde Cdr BG Mark O'Niel - DCG(Support) MG William Webster - 3ID CG
Other Memories
We called the unit the Division Support Brigade or DSB as it was no longer a DISCOM and the generic modular design name of Sustainment Unit of Action or SUA sounded silly. Later SUAs would be called Sustainment Brigades, and the unit officially became the 3d Sustainment Brigade. Because of this transitory period with no official designation, The Institute of Heraldry designated the unit name as the 3d Support Brigade for its first year, Jun 2005 to Jun 2006. June 2006 is the first time the unit members removed the 3ID patch from their right shoulder and donned the 3d Sustainment Brigade patch, a patch they designed (my input was adding the blue and white stripes in the background that harkend to its 3ID lineage). I never wore this patch, as I moved from the DSB to the 3ID G4 the week before the patch ceremony, but COL Layer stated we were all authorized to wear it as a Combat Shoulder Sleeve Insignia because technically it was our authorized patch for the last 6 months in Iraq. Like his fellow DISCOM Commanders at the time, he was reluctant to take off the Division patch and don the Sustainment Brigade Patch. He would not change the patch in Iraq because he didn't want to send an unintended message that the DISCOM was gone and the new Sustainment Brigade didn't work for the Division.
Best Friends
LTC Shawn Morrissey, DCO MAJ Kim Daub, Deputy SPO MAJ Tim Leudecking, Plans Officer LTC Bill Keeton, SPO MAJ "Yak" Yacavone, Chaplain CPT Dave Guida, ISF LNO CPT Jen Cave, Adjutant CPT Misty Frodyma, Asst S3 SGM Gloria Farrow, S3 SGM CPT Trish Gary, S2
Best Moment
Planning and executing a 350-mile Ground Assault Convoy from Camp Virginia, Kuwait to Camp Taji, Iraq just north of Baghdad in early Feb 2005.
Worst Moment
The first loss of a Soldier, SPC Anthony Glenn Jones, in combat action within the DSB on my last day as the Brigade S3, 14 Jun 2005.
Chain of Command
LTC Nate Glover, 3d DSB XO COL Brian Layer, 3d DSB Cdr MG William Webster, 3ID CG
Criteria The Bronze Star Medal may be awarded to individuals who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States in a combat theater, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding ac... The Bronze Star Medal may be awarded to individuals who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States in a combat theater, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement, or by meritorious service not involving aerial flight. MoreHide
Comments The Bronze Star Medal is awarded to Major Samuel L. Russell for exceptional meritorious service while serving dually as the Brigade (S3) Operations Officer in the 3d Infantry Division Support Brigade ... The Bronze Star Medal is awarded to Major Samuel L. Russell for exceptional meritorious service while serving dually as the Brigade (S3) Operations Officer in the 3d Infantry Division Support Brigade and the Multi-National Division Baghdad (MND-B) Logistics-Effects Coordinator in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 8 January 2005 until 8 January 2006.
Major Samuel L. Russell, the primary catalyst in providing optimum logistical support and readiness to Central Command (CENTCOM) and MND-B during OIF 04-06, deliberately planned, organized and synchronized asymmetrical combat service support to over 34,000 Soldiers dispersed within eight brigade combat teams while simultaneously leading the Army's first modular Sustainment Unit of Action (SUA) gallantly during full-spectrum combat logistical support operations across Task Force Baghdad's area of operations.
More specifically, Major Russell seamlessly orchestrated flawless support operations during the RSOI phase of the deployment by continual preparation, training and aggressive supervision of port operations as the DSB unloaded and transported 256 containers, 464 wheeled vehicles and 311 trailers on eight shipping vessels to various staging areas in Kuwait. In addition, prior to executing RIP/TOA with 1st Cavalry Division, Major Russell decisively assessed, planned and rehearsed potential insurgent vulnerabilities and targets, mitigating potential risk. As a direct result of his expertise and competence the brigade's three battalion staff headquarters sustained no casualties during convoy assault operations, covering 300 kilometers in three days from Kuwait to respective Forward Operating Bases north of Baghdad.
Consequently, his extensive efforts set highly favorable conditions for future sustaining operations, combat logistical patrols, re-supply and maintenance support missions to MND-B area of operations. Moreover, Major Russell's congruently coordinated efforts resulted in the Division Support Brigade conducting over 700 combat logistics patrols and 1,500 re-supply and maintenance support (GS and DS) missions to MND-B's area of operations.
Remarkably, Major Russell spearheaded well coordinated MND-B Marne weekly logistics meetings between senior division logistical leaders, 3ID G4, and respective brigade executive officers, resulting in impeccable fleet-management for MND-B while sustaining an impressive 90% aggregated logistical operational readiness rate throughout OIF 04-06. Additionally, Major Russell, a consummate logistician and trainer, provided invaluable leadership and expertise during the initial eight month of MND-B's up-armor initiative and during its critical transition with 46th Corps Support Group and 4th Sustainment Brigade.
Notably, Major Russell ardently provided MND-B and Multi-Coalition Forces paramount logistical support during intensive OIF 04-06 operations while assisting the Iraqi Army and Iraqi Security Forces establish and stabilize security and democracy. Major Russell's superior leadership, distinguished professionalism and dedication were instrumental to the success of Multi-Division Baghdad. His performance reflects great credit upon himself, the 3d Infantry Division and the United States Army.
Signed: William G Webster, Major General, US Army, Commanding. MoreHide
Criteria The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous... The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles. To be eligible for the Iraq Campaign Medal, a Service member must be assigned or attahced to a unit participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq for 30 consecutive days or for 60 nonconsecutive days or meet one of the following criteria: Be engaged in actual combat against the enemy under circumstances involving grave danger of death or serious bodily injury from enemy action, regardless of the amount of time the individual has served in Iraq; While participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom or on official duties (regardless of the time spent in Iraq) is killed, wounded or injured to the extent that he or she requires medical evacuation from Iraq; or, While participating as a regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, within, or over Iraq in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these criteria shall count as one day towards the 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive day requirement. Service members who qualified for the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal by reason of service between March 19, 2003 and April 30, 2005 shall remain qualified for that medal. However, any such person may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal for that service, at his or her request. In addition, any Army soldier who was authorized the arrowhead device may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with arrowhead device in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal with arrowhead device. No service member shall be entitled to both the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and the Iraq Campaign Medal for the same act, achievement, or period of service. Only one award of the Iraq Campaign Medal may be authorized for any individual. The Iraq Campaign Medal may be awarded posthumously to any Service members who loses his or her life while, as a direct result of participating in qualifying operations, without regard to the length of time in the area of eligibility, if otherwise applicable. MoreHide
Comments
Iraqi Governance â?? June 29, 2004 to December 15, 2005
Criteria The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous... The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles. To be eligible for the Iraq Campaign Medal, a Service member must be assigned or attahced to a unit participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq for 30 consecutive days or for 60 nonconsecutive days or meet one of the following criteria: Be engaged in actual combat against the enemy under circumstances involving grave danger of death or serious bodily injury from enemy action, regardless of the amount of time the individual has served in Iraq; While participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom or on official duties (regardless of the time spent in Iraq) is killed, wounded or injured to the extent that he or she requires medical evacuation from Iraq; or, While participating as a regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, within, or over Iraq in direct support of Operation Iraqi Freedom; each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these criteria shall count as one day towards the 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive day requirement. Service members who qualified for the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal by reason of service between March 19, 2003 and April 30, 2005 shall remain qualified for that medal. However, any such person may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal for that service, at his or her request. In addition, any Army soldier who was authorized the arrowhead device may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with arrowhead device in lieu of the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal with arrowhead device. No service member shall be entitled to both the War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and the Iraq Campaign Medal for the same act, achievement, or period of service. Only one award of the Iraq Campaign Medal may be authorized for any individual. The Iraq Campaign Medal may be awarded posthumously to any Service members who loses his or her life while, as a direct result of participating in qualifying operations, without regard to the length of time in the area of eligibility, if otherwise applicable. MoreHide
Comments
National Resolution â?? December 16, 2005 to January 9, 2007
Criteria The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (p... The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (provided they have an active Army status on or after August 1, 1981). This ribbon may not be awarded for overseas service recognized by another United States service medal. MoreHide
Description In June 2004, under the auspices of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546 the Coalition transferred limited sovereignty to a caretaker government, whose first act was to begin the trial of SIn June 2004, under the auspices of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546 the Coalition transferred limited sovereignty to a caretaker government, whose first act was to begin the trial of Saddam Hussein. The government began the process of moving towards elections, though the insurgency, and the lack of cohesion within the government itself, led to repeated delays.
Militia leader Muqtada al-Sadr used his grass-roots organization and Mahdi Militia of over a thousand armed men to take control of the streets of Baghdad. The CPA soon realized it had lost control and closed down his popular newspaper. This resulted in mass anti-American demonstrations. The CPA then attempted to arrest al-Sadr on murder charges. He defied the American military by taking refuge in the Holy City of Najaf.
Through the months of July and August, a series of skirmishes in and around Najaf culminated with the Imman Ali Mosque itself under siege, only to have a peace deal brokered by al-Sistani in late August. Al-Sadr then declared a national cease fire, and opened negotiations with the American and government forces. His militia was incorporated into the Iraqi security forces and al-Sadr is now a special envoy. This incident was the turning point in the failed American efforts to install Ahmed Chalabi as leader of the interim government. The CPA then put Iyad Allawi in power; ultimately he was only marginally more popular than Chalabi.
The Allawi government, with significant numbers of holdovers from the Coalition Provisional Authority, began to engage in attempts to secure control of the oil infrastructure, the source of Iraq's foreign currency, and control of the major cities of Iraq. The continuing insurgencies, poor state of the Iraqi Army, disorganized condition of police and security forces, as well as the lack of revenue hampered their efforts to assert control. In addition, both former Ba'athist elements and militant Shia groups engaged in sabotage, terrorism, open rebellion, and establishing their own security zones in all or part of a dozen cities. The Allawi government vowed to crush resistance, using U.S. troops, but at the same time negotiated with Muqtada al-Sadr.
Offensives and counteroffensives
Beginning 8 November, American and Iraqi forces invaded the militant stronghold of Fallujah in Operation Phantom Fury, killing and capturing many insurgents. Many rebels were thought to have fled the city before the invasion. U.S.-backed figures put insurgency losses at over 2,000. It was the bloodiest single battle for the U.S. in the war, with 92 Americans dead and several hundred wounded. A video showing the killing of at least one unarmed and wounded man by an American serviceman surfaced, throwing renewed doubt and outrage at the efficiency of the U.S. occupation. The Marine was later cleared of any wrongdoing because the Marines had been warned that the enemy would sometimes feign death and booby-trap bodies as a tactic to lure Marines to their deaths. November was the deadliest month of the occupation for coalition troops, surpassing April.
Another offensive was launched by insurgents during the month of November in Mosul. U.S. forces backed by peshmerga fighters launched a counteroffensive which resulted in the Battle of Mosul (2004). The fighting in Mosul occurred concurrently with the fighting in Fallujah and attributed to the high number of American casualties taken that month.
In December, 14 American soldiers were killed and over a hundred injured when an explosion struck an open-tent mess hall in Mosul, where President Bush had spent Thanksgiving with troops the year before. The explosion is believed to have come from a suicide bomber.
After a review of the military strategy in the end of 2004, then commanding general of the MNF-I, General George W. Casey, Jr. directed the Coalition forces to shift their focus from fighting insurgents to training Iraqis. At the time, the Iraqi insurgency was mainly directed against the occupation and it was believed that if the Coalition would reduce its presence then the insurgency would diminish. Military planners hoped that national elections would change the perception of being under occupation, stabilize the situation and allow the Coalition to reduce its presence.
2005
Iraqi elections and aftermath
Voters in the 2005 Iraqi legislative election
Main article: Iraqi legislative election, January 2005
On 30 January, an election for a government to draft a permanent constitution took place. Although some violence and lack of widespread Sunni Arab participation marred the event, most of the eligible Kurd and Shia populace participated. On 4 February, Paul Wolfowitz announced that 15,000 U.S. troops whose tours of duty had been extended in order to provide election security would be pulled out of Iraq by the next month.[18] February, March and April proved to be relatively peaceful months compared to the carnage of November and January, with insurgent attacks averaging 30 a day from the average 70.
Hopes for a quick end to an insurgency and a withdrawal of U.S. troops were dashed at the advent of May, Iraq's bloodiest month since the invasion of U.S. forces in March and April 2003. Suicide bombers, believed to be mainly disheartened Iraqi Sunni Arabs, Syrians and Saudis, tore through Iraq. Their targets were often Shia gatherings or civilian concentrations mainly of Shias. As a result, over 700 Iraqi civilians died in that month, as well as 79 U.S. soldiers.
A large weapons cache in New Ubaydi is destroyed
During early and mid-May, the U.S. also launched Operation Matador, an assault by around 1,000 Marines in the ungoverned region of western Iraq. Its goal was the closing of suspected insurgent supply routes of volunteers and material from Syria, and with the fight they received their assumption proved correct. Fighters armed with flak jackets (unseen in the insurgency by this time) and sporting sophisticated tactics met the Marines, eventually inflicting 30 U.S. casualties by the operation's end, and suffering 125 casualties themselves.
The Marines succeeded, recapturing the whole region and even fighting insurgents all the way to the Syrian border, where they were forced to stop (Syrian residents living near the border heard the American bombs very clearly during the operation). The vast majority of these armed and trained insurgents quickly dispersed before the U.S. could bring the full force of its firepower on them, as it did in Fallujah.
Announcements and renewed fighting
On 14 August 2005 the Washington Post quoted one anonymous U.S. senior official expressing that "the United States no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society in which the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges... 'What we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground'".
On 22 September 2005, Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, said he had warned the Bush administration that Iraq was hurtling toward disintegration, and that the election planned for December was unlikely to make any difference. U.S. officials immediately made statements rejecting this view.
Constitutional ratification and elections
The National Assembly elected in January had drafted a new constitution to be ratified in a national referendum on 15 October 2005. For ratification, the constitution required a majority of national vote, and could be blocked by a two thirds "no" vote in each of at least three of the 18 governorates. In the actual vote, 79% of the voters voted in favor, and there was a two thirds "no" vote in only two governorates, both predominantly Sunni. The new Constitution of Iraq was ratified and took effect. Sunni turnout was substantially heavier than for the January elections, but insufficient to block ratification.
Elections for a new Iraqi National Assembly were held under the new constitution on 15 December 2005. This election used a proportional system, with approximately 25% of the seats required to be filled by women. After the election, a coalition government was formed under the leadership of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, with Jalal Talabani as president.... More
Description Elections for a new Iraqi National Assembly were held under the new constitution on 15 December 2005. This election used a proportional system, with approximately 25% of the seats required to be filleElections for a new Iraqi National Assembly were held under the new constitution on 15 December 2005. This election used a proportional system, with approximately 25% of the seats required to be filled by women. After the election, a coalition government was formed under the leadership of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, with Jalal Talabani as president.
2006
The beginning of that year was marked by government creation talks and continuous anti-coalition and attacks on mainly Shia civilians.
On 22 February 2006. bombs exploded at the Al Askari Mosque causing substantial damage.
On 2 March the director of the Baghdad morgue fled Iraq explaining, "7,000 people have been killed by death squads in recent months." The Boston Globe reported that around eight times the number of Iraqis killed by terrorist bombings during March 2006 were killed by sectarian death squads during the same period. A total of 1,313 were killed by sectarian militias while 173 were killed by suicide bombings. The LA Times later reported that about 3,800 Iraqis were killed by sectarian violence in Baghdad alone during the first three months of 2006. During April 2006, morgue numbers show that 1,091 Baghdad residents were killed by sectarian executions.
Insurgencies, frequent terrorist attacks and sectarian violence in Iraq lead to harsh criticism of US policy and fears of a failing state and civil war. The concerns were expressed by several US think tanks as well as the US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad.
In early 2006, a handful of high-ranking retired generals began to demand Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's resignation due in part to the aforementioned chaos that apparently resulted from his management of the war.
Forward Operating Base Courage handed over to Nineveh province government
Ninawa Governorate
A former presidential compound of Saddam Hussein, dubbed Forward Operating Base Courage by Coalition forces, was handed over by Charlie Company 4-11FA to the Nineveh province government on 20 July 2006. The main palace had been home to the 101st Airborne Division Main Command Post, Task Force Olympia CP, 4-11FA of the 172nd SBCT, and the Task Force Freedom CP. The palace served as the last command post for the Multinational Force-Iraqâ??Northwest. U.S. soldiers had spent the summer restoring the palace for the eventual handover.
Maj. Gen. Thomas R. Turner II, commanding general, Task Force Band of Brothers stated at a ceremony marking the occasion "The turnover of Forward Operating Base Courage is one of the larger efforts towards empowering the Iraqi people and represents an important step in achieving Iraqi self-reliance...The gains made during the past three years demonstrate that the provincial government, the Iraqi Army and the Iraqi Police are increasing their capabilities to take the lead for their nationâ??s security." Duraid Mohammed Daâ??ud Abbodi Kashmoula, the Nineveh province governor, stated after being handed the key to the palace "Now this palace will be used to benefit the Iraqi government and its people."
Situation in and around Baghdad
Elections for a new Iraqi National Assembly were held under the new constitution on 15 December 2005. This election used a proportional system, with approximately 25% of the seats required to be filled by women. After the election, a coalition government was formed under the leadership of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, with Jalal Talabani as president.
2006
Al-Askari shrine bombing and Sunni-Shia fighting
On 2 March the director of the Baghdad morgue fled Iraq explaining, "7,000 people have been killed by death squads in recent months." The Boston Globe reported that around eight times the number of Iraqis killed by terrorist bombings during March 2006 were killed by sectarian death squads during the same period. A total of 1,313 were killed by sectarian militias while 173 were killed by suicide bombings. The LA Times later reported that about 3,800 Iraqis were killed by sectarian violence in Baghdad alone during the first three months of 2006. During April 2006, morgue numbers show that 1,091 Baghdad residents were killed by sectarian executions.
Insurgencies, frequent terrorist attacks and sectarian violence in Iraq lead to harsh criticism of US policy and fears of a failing state and civil war. The concerns were expressed by several US think tanks as well as the US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad.
In early 2006, a handful of high-ranking retired generals began to demand Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's resignation due in part to the aforementioned chaos that apparently resulted from his management of the war.
A US general said on 28 August 2006 violence has fallen in Baghdad by nearly a half since July, although he acknowledged a spike in bombings in the past 48 hours. "Insurgents and terrorists are hitting back in an attempt to offset the success of the Iraqi government and its security forces", Maj Gen William Caldwell told reporters. After meeting Iraqi Defence Minister Abdul-Qader Mohammed Jassim al-Mifarji, UK Defence Minister Des Browne said Iraq was moving forward. "Each time I come, I see more progress", he said.
The American military command acknowledged in the week of 16 October 2006 that it was considering an overhaul of its latest security plan for Baghdad, where three months of intensive American-led sweeps had failed to curb violence by Sunni Arab-led insurgents and Shiite and Sunni militias.
Numerous car and roadside bombs rocked the capital 9 November 2006 morning: In the Karrada district, a car bomb killed six and wounded 28 others. Another car bomb killed seven and wounded another 27 in the northern Qahira neighborhood. In South Baghdad, a mortar then a suicide car bomber killed seven and wounded 27 others near the Mishin bazaar. Near the college of Fine Arts in north-central Baghdad, a car bomb targeting an Iraqi patrol killed three and wounded six others. Two policemen were injured when they tried to dismantle a car bomb in the Zayouna district. A car bomb on Palestine Street in northeastern Baghdad meant for an Iraqi patrol killed one soldier but also wounded four civilians. Yet another car bomb in southern Baghdad wounded three people. And another car bomb near a passport services building in a northern neighborhood killed 2 people and wounded 7 others.
A roadside bomb in central Baghdad killed two and wounded 26 others. A police patrol was blasted by a roadside bomb near a petrol station; four were killed in the explosion. Another four people were wounded in the New Baghdad neighborhood by yet another roadside bomb. A bomb hidden in a sack exploded in Tayern square killing three and wounding 19. Another bomb in the Doura neighborhood killed one and wounded three. Mortars fell in Kadmiyah killing one woman and injuring eight people, and in Bayaladat where four were wounded.
Also in the capital, a group of laborers were kidnapped 9 November 2006 morning; five bodies were recovered later in the Doura neighborhood, but at least one other body was found in Baghdad 9 November 2006. Gunmen killed a police colonel and his driver in eastern Baghdad. And just outside of town, police arrested two people in a raid and discovered one corpse.
10 November 2006, Iraqi police recovered 18 bullet-riddled bodies in various neighborhoods around the capital. Police were unable to identify the bodies.
11 November 2006, two bombs planted in an outdoor market in central Baghdad exploded around noon, killing six and wounded 32 people. A car bomb and a roadside bomb were detonated five minutes apart in the market, which is in an area close to Baghdad's main commercial center. The U.S. military said it has put up a $50,000 reward for anyone who helps find an American soldier kidnapped in Baghdad. The 42-year-old Army Reserve specialist, Ahmed K. Altaie, was abducted on 23 October when he left the Green Zone, the heavily fortified section where the United States maintains its headquarters, to visit his Iraqi wife and family.
A suicide bomber killed 40 Iraqis and wounded 70 November 12, 2006 morning outside the national police headquarters' recruitment center in western Baghdad, an emergency police official said. They were among dozens of men waiting to join the police force in the Qadessiya district when a suicide bomber detonated an explosives belt. In central Baghdad, a car bomb and roadside bomb killed four Iraqi civilians and wounded 10 near the Interior Ministry complex. And in the Karrada district of central Baghdad, one Iraqi was killed and five were wounded when a car bomb exploded near an outdoor market 12 November 2006 morning. Gunmen shot dead an Iraqi officer with the new Iraqi intelligence system as he was walking towards his parked car in the southwestern Baghdad neighborhood of Bayaa. Two civilians were killed and four more were wounded when a roadside bomb hit a car in the eastern Baghdad neighborhood of Zayuna.
Violent incidents in other cities
9 November 2006.
Suwayrah: Four bodies were recovered from the Tigris River. Three of them were in police uniforms.
Amarah: A roadside bomb killed one and wounded three others in Amarah. Gunmen also shot dead a suspected former member of the Fedayeen paramilitary.
Muqdadiyah: Gunmen stormed a primary school and killed three: a guard, a policeman and a student.
Tal Afar: A roadside bomb in Tal Afar killed four, including a policeman, and wounded eight other people. Two policemen were killed and four civilians were injured when a rocket landed in a residential neighborhood.
Mosul: Six people were shot dead, including one policeman.
Latifiya: Four bodies, bound and gagged, were discovered.
Baqubah: Eight people were killed in different incidents.
11 November 2006.
Latifiya: Gunmen killed a truck driver and kidnapped 11 Iraqis after stopping four vehicles at a fake checkpoint south of the capital. At the fake checkpoint in Latifiya, about 25 miles (40 km) south of Baghdad, gunmen took the four vehiclesâ??three minibuses and a truckâ??along with the kidnapped Iraqis. The Iraqisâ??11 men and three womenâ??were driving from Diwaniya to Baghdad for shopping when they were stopped. The gunmen left the three women and kidnapped the 11 men, the official said.
Baqubah: North of the capital near Baquba, a suicide car bomb explosion killed two people at the main gate of a police station in Zaghanya town.
Al-Qaeda
Although Saddam Hussein was accused of having links to Al-Qaeda members, only a few Al-Qaeda members were found hiding in Iraq before the invasion, and all were of lower standings.
On 3 September 2006, Iraq says it has arrested the country's second most senior figure in Al-Qaeda, "severely wounding" an organization the US military says is spreading sectarian violence that could bring civil war. The National Security Adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie summoned reporters to a hastily arranged news conference to announce that al Qaeda leader Hamid Juma Faris al-Suaidi had been seized some days ago. Hitherto little heard of, and also known as Abu Humam or Abu Rana, Suaidi was captured hiding in a building with a group of followers. "Al-Qaeda in Iraq is severely wounded", Rubaie said. He said Suaidi had been involved in ordering the bombing of the Shi'ite shrine in Samarra in February 2006 that unleashed the wave of tit-for-tat killings now threatening civil war. Iraqi officials blame Al-Qaeda for the attack. The group denies it. Rubaie did not give Suaidi's nationality. He said he had been tracked to the same area north of Baghdad where US forces killed Al-Qaeda's leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in June 2006. "He was hiding in a building used by families. He wanted to use children and women as human shields", Rubaie said. Little is publicly known about Suaidi. Rubaie called him the deputy of Abu Ayyub al-Masri, a shadowy figure, probably Egyptian, who took over the Sunni Islamist group from Zarqawi.
The US military says Al-Qaeda is a "prime instigator" of the violence between Iraq's Sunni minority and Shi'ite majority but that U.S. and Iraqi operations have "severely disrupted" it.
A handover ceremony on 2 September 2006 was postponed at the last minute, first to 3 September 2006, then indefinitely, after a dispute emerged between the government and Washington over the wording of a document outlining their armies' new working relationship. "There are some disputes", an Iraqi government source said. "We want thorough control and the freedom to make decisions independently." US spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Barry Johnson played down any arguments and expected a signing soon: "It is embarrassing but it was decided it was better not to sign the document." Practically, US troops remain the dominant force. Their tanks entered the southern, Shi'ite city of Diwaniya on 3 September 2006. The show of force came a week after Shi'ite militiamen killed 20 Iraqi troops in a battle that highlighted violent power struggles between rival Shi'ite factions in the oil-rich south.
Abu Ghraib
On 2 September 2006, the Abu Ghraib prison was formally handed over to Iraq's government. The formal transfer was conducted between Major General Jack Gardner, Commander of Task Force 134, and representatives of the Iraqi Ministry of Justice and the Iraqi army.
Iraqi government takes control of the 8th Iraqi Army Division
On 7 September 2006, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki signed a document taking control of Iraq's small naval and air forces and the 8th Iraqi Army Division, based in the south. At a ceremony marking the occasion, Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq stated "From today forward, the Iraqi military responsibilities will be increasingly conceived and led by Iraqis." Previously, the U.S.-led Multi-National Force-Iraq, commanded by Casey, gave orders to the Iraqi armed forces through a joint American-Iraqi headquarters and chain of command. After the handover, the chain of command flows directly from the prime minister in his role as Iraqi commander in chief, through his Defense Ministry to the Iraqi Joint Forces Command. From there, the orders go to Iraqi units on the ground. The other nine Iraqi division remained under U.S. command, with authority gradually being transferred. U.S. military officials said there was no specific timetable for the transition.
Anbar province reported as politically "lost" to U.S. and Iraqi government
On 11 September 2006, it transpired that Colonel Peter Devlin, chief of intelligence for the Marine Corps in Iraq, had filed a secret report, described by those who have seen it as saying that the U.S. and the Iraqi government have been defeated politically in Anbar province. According to The Washington Post, an unnamed Defense Department source described Devlin as saying "there are no functioning Iraqi government institutions in Anbar, leaving a vacuum that has been filled by the insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq, which has become the province's most significant political force." The Post said that Devlin is a very experienced intelligence officer whose report was being taken seriously.
The next day, Major General Richard Zilmer, commander of the Marines in Iraq, stated: "We are winning this war... I have never heard any discussion about the war being lost before this weekend."
In the fall of 2006 several Iraqi tribes near Ramadi led by Sheikh Abdul Sattar Abu Risha revolted against various insurgent groups with Al Qaeda in Iraq. They formed the Anbar Awakening and helped turn the tide in favor of the US military.
Two more provinces were transferred to Provincial Iraqi Control in late 2006.
On 21 September 2006, Italian troops handed security control of the Dhi Qar province to Iraqi forces, making Dhi Qar the second of the country's 18 provinces to come under complete local control. A transfer ceremony was carried out in Nasiriyah.
On 20 December 2006, U.S. forces handed over control of the southern province of Najaf to Iraqi security forces.
2007
Sheikh Abdul Sittar who helped spark the Anbar Awakening Movement
In early 2007 US and Iraqi tribal forces secured Ramadi, as well as other cities such as Hit, Haditha, Rutbah, and Al Qaim. During the summer the US turned its attention to eastern Anbar and secured the cities of Fallujah and Al-Karmah.
The majority of the fighting was over by September 2007, although US forces would maintain a stability and advisory role for over two more years. Celebrating the victory, President George W. Bush flew to Anbar in August 2007 to congratulate Sheik Sattar and other leading tribal figures.... More
Description Camp Taji was a military installation, also known as Camp Cooke used by coalition forces near Taji or Al Taji, Iraq. The camp is located in a rural region approximately 27 km (17 mi) north of the cityCamp Taji was a military installation, also known as Camp Cooke used by coalition forces near Taji or Al Taji, Iraq. The camp is located in a rural region approximately 27 km (17 mi) north of the city of Baghdad in the Baghdad Governorate.... More
Description Camp Rustamiyah (formerly Camp Muleskinner or Camp Cuervo) was a forward operating base for the U.S. Army in Iraq. It was the site of the oldest military academy in Iraq. Camp Rustamiyah was captured Camp Rustamiyah (formerly Camp Muleskinner or Camp Cuervo) was a forward operating base for the U.S. Army in Iraq. It was the site of the oldest military academy in Iraq. Camp Rustamiyah was captured by the United States during the Iraq War.
The academy was re-opened under NATO direction in 2005/6.
In 2009, the United States transferred control of Camp Rustamiyah back to the Iraqi security forces.... More
Memories
94th Brigade Support Battalion (BSB), 4th Brigade Combat Team (BCT), 10th Mountain Division
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Major Samuel Russell for meritorious service while assigned to the Logistics Task Force 559th as the Deputy Commander in support of Operation Enduring Freed... The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Major Samuel Russell for meritorious service while assigned to the Logistics Task Force 559th as the Deputy Commander in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Major Russell's superb leadership and total dedication in operating the theater logistics hub reflect great credit upon himself, this command and the United States Army. From 1 Aug 2002 to 28 Feb 2003 this 28th day of December 2002.
Signed: Henry W. Stratman, Major General, USA, Deputy Commanding General (Support). MoreHide
Criteria Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have participated in or served in support of Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001 and to a future date to be determined... Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have participated in or served in support of Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001 and to a future date to be determined. MoreHide
Criteria Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have been deployed abroad for service in the Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001, and to a future date to be determine... Individuals authorized the award of this medal must have been deployed abroad for service in the Global War on Terrorism operations on or after September 11, 2001, and to a future date to be determined MoreHide
Criteria This medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for thirty consecutive or for six... This medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for thirty consecutive or for sixty non-consecutive days, or who meet the following criteria: Be engaged in combat during an armed engagement, regardless of the time in the area of elibility; Is wounded or injured in the line of duty and requires medical evacuation from the area of eligibility; While participating as a regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, or within the area of eligibility in direct support of military operations. Each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these criteria shall count as one day toward the 30 or 60 day requirement; Personnel who serve in operations and exercises conducted in the area of eligibility are considered for the award as long as the basic time criteria are met. Due to the extensive time period for KDSM eligibility, the non-consecutive service period for eligibility remains cumulative throughout the entire period. The Area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the Republic of Korea, and the continuous water out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land and water areas. MoreHide
Comments
Service with 2nd Inf Div at Camp Red Cloud.
Criteria The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (p... The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (provided they have an active Army status on or after August 1, 1981). This ribbon may not be awarded for overseas service recognized by another United States service medal. MoreHide
Description "Operation Enduring Freedom" (OEF) is the current official name used by the U.S. government for the War in Afghanistan, together with a number of smaller military actions, under the umbrella of the Gl"Operation Enduring Freedom" (OEF) is the current official name used by the U.S. government for the War in Afghanistan, together with a number of smaller military actions, under the umbrella of the Global "War on Terror" (GWOT).
The operation was originally called "Operation Infinite Justice", but as similar phrases have been used by adherents of several religions as an exclusive description of God, it is believed to have been changed to avoid offense to Muslims, who are the majority religion in Afghanistan. U.S. President George W. Bush's remark that "this crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take a while", which prompted widespread criticism from the Islamic world, may also have contributed to the renaming of the operation.
The Operation comprises several subordinate operations:
Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan (OEF-)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Philippines (OEF-P, formerly Operation Freedom Eagle)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Horn of Africa (OEF-HOA)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Pankisi Gorge (completed in 2004)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Trans Sahara (OEF-TS; see also Insurgency in the Maghreb)
Operation Enduring Freedom – Caribbean and Central America (OEF-CCA)
The term "OEF" typically refers to the war in Afghanistan. Other operations, such as the Georgia Train and Equip Program, are only loosely or nominally connected to OEF, such as through government funding vehicles. All the operations, however, have a focus on counterterrorism activities.
Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan, which is a joint U.S., U.K. and Afghan operation, is separate from the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), which is an operation of North Atlantic Treaty Organization nations including the U.S. and U.K. The two operations run in parallel, and although it has been intended that they merge for some time, this has not yet happened.
Overview
In response to the attacks of 11 September, the early combat operations that took place on 7 October 2001 to include a mix of strikes from land-based B-1 Lancer, B-2 Spirit and B-52 Stratofortress bombers, carrier-based F-14 Tomcat and F/A-18 Hornet fighters, and Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from both U.S. and British ships and submarines signaled the start of Operation Enduring Freedom – Afghanistan (OEF-A).
The initial military objectives of OEF-A, as articulated by President George W. Bush in his 20 September Address to a Joint Session of Congress and his 7 October address to the country, included the destruction of terrorist training camps and infrastructure within Afghanistan, the capture of al-Qaeda leaders, and the cessation of terrorist activities in Afghanistan."
In January 2002, over 1,200 soldiers from the United States Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC) deployed to the Philippines to support the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in their push to uproot terrorist forces on the island of Basilan. Of those groups included are Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah.[8] The operation consisted of training the AFP in counter-terrorist operations as well as supporting the local people with humanitarian aid in Operation Smiles.
In October 2002, the Combined Task Force 150 and United States military Special Forces established themselves in Djibouti at Camp Lemonnier. The stated goals of the operation were to provide humanitarian aid and patrol the Horn of Africa to reduce the abilities of terrorist organizations in the region. Similar to OEF-P, the goal of humanitarian aid was emphasised, ostensibly to prevent militant organizations from being able to take hold amongst the population as well as reemerge after being removed.
The military aspect involves coalition forces searching and boarding ships entering the region for illegal cargo as well as providing training and equipment to the armed forces in the region. The humanitarian aspect involves building schools, clinics and water wells to enforce the confidence of the local people.
Since 2001, the cumulative expenditure by the U.S. government on Operation Enduring Freedom has exceeded $150 billion.
The operation continues, with military direction mostly coming from United States Central Command.... More
Memories
LTF 559, 64th AEG, Camp Snoopy, Doha, Qatar
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Criteria The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service... The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service during the current War on Terrorism. In addition, all members of the National Guard and Reserve who were part of the Selected Reserve in good standing between August 2, 1990, to November 30, 1995, are eligible for the National Defense Service Medal. In the case of Navy personnel, Midshipment attending the Naval Academy during the qualifying periods are eligible for this award, and Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) Midshipmen ae only eligible if they participated in a summer cruise that was in an area which qualified for a campaign medal. MoreHide
Criteria The Joint Service Commendation Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces who, while assigned to a joint activity, distinguish themselves by outstanding ac... The Joint Service Commendation Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces who, while assigned to a joint activity, distinguish themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service, but not to an extent that would justify award of the Defense Meritorious Service Medal. MoreHide
Comments The Joint Service Commendation Medal is awarded to Samuel L. Russell. Major Samuel L. Russell, United States Army, Distinguished himself by exceptionally meritorious service as Executive Assistant an... The Joint Service Commendation Medal is awarded to Samuel L. Russell. Major Samuel L. Russell, United States Army, Distinguished himself by exceptionally meritorious service as Executive Assistant and Logistics Information System Officer, Logistics Directorate, U.S. Joint Forces Command from June 1998 to June 2000. Major Russell's exceptional leadership abilities and results oriented approach to any task were instrumental in the Logistics Directorate's notable reputation for mission accomplishment. He initiated many reforms to improve the efficiency and productivity of the Logistics Directorate administrative staff in response to command reorganizations. As the Executive Assistant, he masterfully coordinated the dynamic schedule of the Director for Logistics and vice Director for Logistics, both general officers, enabling them to focus on significant critical issues. He demonstrated remarkable professional skills required of officers two levels higher in grade and rank as he maintained stability in the Directorate for two months when the Deputy Director's billet was vacant. As the Directorate's Logistics Information Systems Officer, Major Russell quickly implemented initiatives to increase awareness across the Directorate of Joint Total Asset Visibility, Automatic Identification Technologies, and Automatic Information Systems. He provided invaluable command input to the Joint Staff on the Information Technology for Deployment, Force Tracking, and Sustainment Joint Warfighter Capability Assessment Study. Through his distinctive accomplishments, Major Russell reflected credit upon himself, the United States Army, and the Department of Defense. Given under my hand this 17th day of April, 2000.
Signed: Robert T. Dail, Brigadier General, U.S. Army, Director for Logistics. MoreHide
Best Friends
CPT Jody Horton, CPT Rick Harney, CPT Charles Hamilton, CPT Dianne Del Rosso, CPT Vick Harmon, CPT Charlie Ipolitto, CPT Rod Palmer, MAJ Jay Poole, MAJ Chuck Toomey, MAJ Lamont Woody
Chain of Command
LTC Jeff Earley - QM Branch Chief LTC James Kennon - QM Branch Chief LTC Bob Chadwick - QM Branch Chief COL Welch - Dir CSS Div
Other Memories
QM FRO and Company Grade Assignment Officer
Criteria The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a... The Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces who distinguish themselves by outstanding noncombat achievement or by meritorious service to the United States, but not of a degree that would warrant the award of the Legion of Merit. MoreHide
Comments The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Captain Samuel L. Russell for outstanding meritorious service from 16 December 1995 to 15 May 1998, while serving as Future Readiness Officer and Lieutenant... The Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to Captain Samuel L. Russell for outstanding meritorious service from 16 December 1995 to 15 May 1998, while serving as Future Readiness Officer and Lieutenants Assignment Officer, Quartermaster Branch, Combat Service Support Division, Officer Personnel Management Directorate. Your selfless devotion to duty and superior professionalism contributed immeasurably to the successful accomplishment of all assigned missions. Your outstanding performance of duty reflects great credit on you, the United States Total Army Personnel Command and the United States Army. Given under my hand in the city of Washington this 5th day of March 1998.
Signed: Thomas W. Garrett, Major General, USA, Commanding. MoreHide
Criteria The Armed Forces Reserve Medal is awarded to United States Armed Forces Reserve component members (or former members) who complete (or have completed) a total of ten years service. This service need n... The Armed Forces Reserve Medal is awarded to United States Armed Forces Reserve component members (or former members) who complete (or have completed) a total of ten years service. This service need not be consecutive, if it was performed within a period of twelve consecutive years. For the purpose of this award service as a member of a Reserve component MoreHide
Best Friends
CPT Scott Glass, CPT Jodi Hodge, CPT Pat Pallatto, CPT Bruce Verde, CPT Dale Latin, CPT Kevin Landy, CPT Will Vertrees, CPT Mike Knox, CPT Kathleen Champman, 1LT Clint Taylor, 1LT Steve Aki, 1LT Michelle Dannenberg, 2LT John Wright 1SG Herbert Hinds
Best Moment
JCS Exercise Bright Star '93 Ulchi Focus Lens '94 Operation Uphold Democracy Sep-Oct '94 JCS Exercise Cobra Gold '95
Chain of Command
LTC Don Plater - BN CDR LTC Rich Burmood - BN CDR BG Tangney, USASOC DCO COL Laney Pankey - SOSCOM Cdr
Description Operation Uphold Democracy (19 September 1994 – 31 March 1995) was an intervention designed to remove the military regime installed by the 1991 Haitian coup d'état that overthrew the elected PresidentOperation Uphold Democracy (19 September 1994 – 31 March 1995) was an intervention designed to remove the military regime installed by the 1991 Haitian coup d'état that overthrew the elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. The operation was effectively authorized by the 31 July 1994 United Nations Security Council Resolution 940.
The U.S.-led, multinational effort to create a safe and secure environment and support the return of exiled President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to Haiti, was conducted from September 1994 through March 1996. In excess of 20,000 American service men and women from the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast Guard, in conjunction with approximately 5,000 non-U.S. forces from 24 nations, served as part of the Multinational Force, and later, United Nations Mission in Haiti. Upon direction of President Bill Clinton, the operation was conducted by U.S. Atlantic Command, in Norfolk, Va.
President Aristide was elected in December 1990 as the first democratically-elected head of state in Haitian history. Seven months after taking office in February 1991, President Aristide was overthrown in a coup led by Lt. Gen. Raoul Cedras, the head of the Forces Armees d'Haiti (FAd'H). This eventually would be the impetus for renewed U.S. operational involvement in Haiti.
A United Nations international embargo began in late June 1993. In support of the international embargo, USACOM activated Joint Task Force 120 in mid-October to conduct maritime interdiction operations and increase pressure on the illegitimate government of Haiti. To provide humanitarian assistance to more than 21,000 Haitians escaping by sea from political strife, USACOM established a second JTF, JTF 160, on May 18, 1994. The mission of JTF 160 included migrant interdiction and processing, both at sea and at designated migrant camp sites ashore. The largest of these migrant camp sites was at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
On July 31 the UN Security Council passed a resolution authorizing the U.S. to use "all means necessary" to remove Haiti's military-backed government. As military forces began final preparations for an invasion, President Bill Clinton dispatched a negotiating team to Haiti to avert an invasion. The team was headed by former President Jimmy Carter, and included former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, retired Gen. Colin Powell, and Senator Sam Nunn, D-Ga., former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
With U.S. invasion forces enroute to Haiti the evening of September 18, Lt. Gen. Cedras relayed his decision to relinquish control and ultimately leave Haiti through the Carter mission. The following morning U.S. forces began a peaceful entry into Haiti.
Over the next six months, significant accomplishments of the U.S.-led MultinationalForce (MNF) included: ensuring the peaceful restoration of President Aristide; helping standup a fragile Government in Haiti; fostering a safe and secure environment; initiating a weapons buy-back program; eliminating arms caches; restoration of electrical power and commercial communications; commencing police force training; overseeing the return of Haitian migrants from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and establishing conditions for democratic elections.
On March 31, 1995, the MNF transferred command to United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH) forces. Under UNMIH, forces continued to maintain a secure and stable environment which facilitated free and fair democratic elections. In addition, civil engineering projects such as repairing schools, roads, bridges, water wells, and distribution systems were undertaken, and thousands of tons of donated materials and supplies were distributed.
On June 25, UNMIH forces provided support and security for Haiti's first round of national parliamentary free elections since the restoration of President Aristide to office.
The last Haitian migrant selected for repatriation from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was returned to Port-au-Prince October 16, 1995. Approximately 75,000 Haitians had been repatriated since the beginning of the maritime interdiction operation; more than 21,000 of which were processed through migrant facilities at Guantanamo Bay.
On December 17, Haiti conducted presidential elections, again with UNMIH forces providing support and security. Former Prime Minister Rene Preval won handily and was inaugurated February 7, 1996, as Haiti's second democratically elected president, succeeding President Aristide.
Criteria The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Natio... The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Nations or friendly foreign nations MoreHide
Comments
Operation Uphold Democracy, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Criteria The Army Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces below the rank of colonel who, while serving in any capacity with the Army in a noncombat area, distinguish themselves by outst... The Army Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces below the rank of colonel who, while serving in any capacity with the Army in a noncombat area, distinguish themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service, but not of a nature that would warrant the award of an Army Commendation Medal. MoreHide
Comments The Army Achievement Medal is awarded to Captain Samuel L. Russell, 528th Support Battalion (Special Operations) (Airborne), for exceptionally meritorious achievement while serving as the Battalion S-... The Army Achievement Medal is awarded to Captain Samuel L. Russell, 528th Support Battalion (Special Operations) (Airborne), for exceptionally meritorious achievement while serving as the Battalion S-4, 528th SOSB (A). CPT Russell's professionalism, logistical expertise, and dedication to duty during the FY 93 close out and Bright Star 94 were outstanding. CPT Russell's exemplary performance of duty reflects great credit upon himself, the 528th Support Battalion (SO) (A), and the United States Army. From 1 August 1993 to 22 November 1993, given under my hand in the city of Washington this 13th Day of December 1993. Signed: Donald E. Plater, Lieutenant Colonel, Quartermaster, Commanding. MoreHide
Chain of Command
BG John J. Cusick, USAQMC&S Commandant COL Michael R. Devine, USAQMC&S Assistant Commandant MAJ Peter A. Martucci, Jr., Advanced Course Branch Professional Development Division Chief CPT Michael �??Mike�?? S. Mullins, Small Group Leader
Other Memories
Quartermaster Officer Advanced Course Class 92-04.
Best Friends
CW2 Leroy Cox, 1LT Shannon Souvenier, 1LT Bill Errands, 1LT Bruce Young, CW3 Ruth Parks, 1LT Steve LaPlante, SFC Joe Schmeltz, SSG Javier Garcia, SFC Nunn
Best Moment
Nijmegan Marches '89 and '90 Caravan Guard '89 Reforger '90
Chain of Command
Company Cdr - CPT Stan Jenkins, then CPT Chuck Moore Bn Cdr - LTC Gary Juskowiak, then LTC Nancy Burton
Other Memories
Field Services Plt Ldr - Jun '89 to Mar '90 POL Plt Ldr - Apr '90 to Jan '91 SSA Accountable Officer (SRO) - Feb '91 to Mar '92
Criteria The Army Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement,... The Army Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement, or meritorious service. MoreHide
Comments The Army Commendation Medal is awarded to First Lieutenant Samuel L. Russell, 29th Supply and Service Company, 142nd Supply and Service Battalion, for exceptionally meritorious service as Field Servic... The Army Commendation Medal is awarded to First Lieutenant Samuel L. Russell, 29th Supply and Service Company, 142nd Supply and Service Battalion, for exceptionally meritorious service as Field Services and POL Platoon Leader and Class II/IV Accountable Officer. Your absolute professionalism and dedication to duty reflect great credit upon yourself, the 16th Corps Support Group, and the United States Army. From 1 June 1989 to 31 May 1992, given under my hand in the city of Washington this 31st day of March 1992. Signed: Colonel Robert Brown, Commander, 16th Corps Support Group, Hanau, Germany. MoreHide
Criteria The Army Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces below the rank of colonel who, while serving in any capacity with the Army in a noncombat area, distinguish themselves by outst... The Army Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces below the rank of colonel who, while serving in any capacity with the Army in a noncombat area, distinguish themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service, but not of a nature that would warrant the award of an Army Commendation Medal. MoreHide
Comments The Army Achievement Medal is awarded to First Lieutenant Samuel L. Russell, 29th Supply and Service Company, 142nd Supply and Service Battalion, for exemplary achievement in supply support activity m... The Army Achievement Medal is awarded to First Lieutenant Samuel L. Russell, 29th Supply and Service Company, 142nd Supply and Service Battalion, for exemplary achievement in supply support activity management resulting in 85% inventory accuracy on an annual wall-to-wall inventory. First Lieutenant Russell's outstanding achievement reflects distinct credit upon him, the 142nd Supply and Service Battalion, and the United States Army. From 3 February 1992 to 7 February 1992, given under my hand in the city of Washington this 19th day of March 1992. Signed: Nancy E. Burton, Lieutenant Colonel, Quartermaster, Commanding. MoreHide
Criteria The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (p... The Overseas Service Ribbon is awarded to all active members of the Army, the Army National Guard, and to Army Reservists who are credited with a normal overseas tour completed since August 1, 1981 (provided they have an active Army status on or after August 1, 1981). This ribbon may not be awarded for overseas service recognized by another United States service medal. MoreHide
Criteria The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service... The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service during the current War on Terrorism. In addition, all members of the National Guard and Reserve who were part of the Selected Reserve in good standing between August 2, 1990, to November 30, 1995, are eligible for the National Defense Service Medal. In the case of Navy personnel, Midshipment attending the Naval Academy during the qualifying periods are eligible for this award, and Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) Midshipmen ae only eligible if they participated in a summer cruise that was in an area which qualified for a campaign medal. MoreHide
Best Friends 2nd Platoon, 4th Squad
2LT Thomas "Tom" M. Andrejcak, AG
2LT Christopher E. Crate, IN
2LT Martin "Marty" J. Moulton, EN
2LT Leo J. Perreault
2LT Reid A. Robertson, EN
SSG Joseph A. Camacho
SGT Michael C. Sanders
SGT Darin L. McAllister
SPC Robert R. Wilson
PFC Kenneth Agueda
PFC Milton Edmonson
Criteria The Army Service Ribbon is awarded to members of the Regular Army, National Guard, or Army Reserve for successful completion of initial entry training. In the case of personnel who receive a Military ... The Army Service Ribbon is awarded to members of the Regular Army, National Guard, or Army Reserve for successful completion of initial entry training. In the case of personnel who receive a Military Occupational Specialty identifier based on civilian or other-service acquired skills, the ribbon is awarded upon honorable completion of four months active service. Only one award of this ribbon is authorized, even if an individual completes both officer and enlisted initial entry training. MoreHide
Best Friends
2LT Paul J. Bohr 2LT Jordan S. Chroman 2LT Ian G. Corey 2LT John W. Culpepper 1LT John Delaney 2LT David M. Hervert 2LT Kevin Hidalgo 2LT Jacqueline A. Hillian 2LT David L. Jones 2LT David 'Dave' A. Londono 2LT David 'Dave' A. McClintock, Jr. 2LT Wayne Murphy 2LT Dudley N. Nesbitt 2LT Robert A. Venables 2LT Herman H. Walker, Jr. 2LT Clayton C. Wieneke 2LT Alan D. Woodard
COL Johnny Johnston COL Rob Horneck COL Sid Thomas COL T.J. Edwards COL Mike Davey LTC Walt Llamas LTC Jesse Wightman LTC Steve Thomas LTC Jasaon Tomasetti LTC Cliff Crawford LTC Bud Bittner LTC Rick Clifton LTC Mimi Dill LTC Gordon Joczik LTC Mike Hampton LTC Mike Williams LTC Marcus Reinhart
BG Karen LeDoux, G4 BG Beth Austin, G4 BG Charles Taylor, CoS MG Kurt Stein, DCG-S MG Gary Cheek, DCG-O LTG Vince Brooks, CG